Reawarding Logo
Beta

Comparison

Reawarding vs Letterboxd

An honest, feature-by-feature comparison — what's the same, where each genuinely wins, and how to bring your ratings over.

The short version

Letterboxd is where most people already log and rate what they watch — a diary, reviews, lists, a big community. Reawarding isn't trying to replace that. It starts from the same rating you'd give a film and takes it one step further: films rated 7 or higher become contenders, a ballot forms for that year, and you crown your own Best Picture winner — compared, if you want, against what the Academy actually picked.

Side-by-side

Feature
Letterboxd
Reawarding
Owner
Independent
Independent
Price
Free
Free
Rating scale
★ 0.5–5
1–10
Written reviews
Yes
Best Picture ballots
Yes — forms automatically at 7+
Compare vs. the real Academy
Yes — Alternate Oscar History
Guest mode (no account)
Limited
Full — ballots migrate on signup
Import the other's ratings
Yes — paste your Letterboxd export
Lists & watchlists
Yes
Yes
Follow / activity feed
Yes, deep
Yes, lightweight
Catalog & community
Large, 15+ years
Growing

Where Reawarding genuinely wins

A winner every year. Letterboxd has no award concept. Films you rate 7+ become contenders automatically, and a ballot forms.

Alternate Oscar History. See your picks side-by-side with what the Academy actually chose, year by year.

One-click import. Paste your Letterboxd export — half-star ratings convert to the 1–10 scale automatically (×2). Safe to re-run any time.

Guest mode is real usage. Build ballots with nothing but a browser. Nothing is thrown away when you decide to sign up.

Where Letterboxd still wins

A comparison that pretends the alternative has no advantages isn't worth reading.

Written reviews

Letterboxd's whole culture is built around review writing. Reawarding is rating-first — no review text.

Social depth

Comments, likes, and a mature follower graph. Reawarding's activity feed is lightweight by design, not the point of the product.

Catalog and community size

15+ years of data, deep arthouse and festival coverage, and a large active community — that's not something a newer product out-scales quickly.

List-making as a genre

Ranked lists and roundups are a mature, first-class feature on Letterboxd. Reawarding doesn't try to match that.

FAQ

Do I have to give up my Letterboxd diary?

No. Keep logging there if that's already your habit — import brings your ratings over so Reawarding can start turning them into ballots.

Will I lose star-rating precision when I import?

No. Letterboxd's half-star scale (0.5–5) maps cleanly onto Reawarding's 1–10 scale (×2) — nothing is rounded away.

Does Reawarding have written reviews?

Not today. It's rating-first and ballot-first, not a review-writing platform — that's a real gap if reviews are why you use Letterboxd.

Can I use both at the same time?

Yes. Most people keep Letterboxd as their diary and use Reawarding as the awards layer on top of the same taste.

Can I re-run the import later?

Yes — it's safe to re-import. Existing ratings are updated, not duplicated.

Bring your ratings over.

Import your Letterboxd export and see your first ballot form.